<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tip: The Importance of having an e-mail Catch All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.colindiponio.com/2008/06/05/tip-the-importance-of-having-an-e-mail-catch-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.colindiponio.com/2008/06/05/tip-the-importance-of-having-an-e-mail-catch-all/</link>
	<description>North West Computer Consultancy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:09:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Colin DiPonio</title>
		<link>http://www.colindiponio.com/2008/06/05/tip-the-importance-of-having-an-e-mail-catch-all/comment-page-1/#comment-4042</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin DiPonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 12:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colindiponio.com/2008/06/05/tip-the-importance-of-having-an-e-mail-catch-all/#comment-4042</guid>
		<description>Hi Gary

I use a company called www.appriver.com to spam filter the messages before I get them (thank god).

But you are correct I do have a small percentage of random rubbish in the catch all.

I check the box a couple of times a day. Itâ€™s not very sophisticated but it does work.

Colin
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gary</p>
<p>I use a company called <a href="http://www.appriver.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.appriver.com</a> to spam filter the messages before I get them (thank god).</p>
<p>But you are correct I do have a small percentage of random rubbish in the catch all.</p>
<p>I check the box a couple of times a day. Itâ€™s not very sophisticated but it does work.</p>
<p>Colin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary F</title>
		<link>http://www.colindiponio.com/2008/06/05/tip-the-importance-of-having-an-e-mail-catch-all/comment-page-1/#comment-4040</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 11:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colindiponio.com/2008/06/05/tip-the-importance-of-having-an-e-mail-catch-all/#comment-4040</guid>
		<description>Sorry to butt in, but what about spammers who take your domain name and then mass mail you at SomeRandomMailbox@yourdomain.com. If you use a catch-all then you&#039;re going to have every bit of spam sent to your inbox. If you&#039;re unlucky enough to have that happen to you and you still want a catch-all then at least 2 layers of spam filtering are needed. e.g. your ISP performing some mild filtering (their spam database should be updated daily) and some client side filtering such as Outlook 2007 which has monthly updates. Boy, do I hate spammers! Outlook catches over 500 a week (I have a catch-all) and I have no idea how many my ISP blocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to butt in, but what about spammers who take your domain name and then mass mail you at <a href="mailto:SomeRandomMailbox@yourdomain.com">SomeRandomMailbox@yourdomain.com</a>. If you use a catch-all then you&#8217;re going to have every bit of spam sent to your inbox. If you&#8217;re unlucky enough to have that happen to you and you still want a catch-all then at least 2 layers of spam filtering are needed. e.g. your ISP performing some mild filtering (their spam database should be updated daily) and some client side filtering such as Outlook 2007 which has monthly updates. Boy, do I hate spammers! Outlook catches over 500 a week (I have a catch-all) and I have no idea how many my ISP blocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

